A rigorous red-teaming evaluation of GPT-4.5 and Claude 3.7 reveals key tradeoffs in hallucination, compliance, security, and codegen risks. Learn how VirtueRed exposes critical safety gaps.

We benchmarked Meta's Llama 4 models vs. GPT-4.5 using VirtueRed. The results reveal major safety gaps in compliance, codegen, and multimodal security.

We put OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 and Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 through extensive red-teaming tests, assessing their risks such as safety, security, hallucination, regulatory compliance, codeGen vulnerabilities, and more.

This blog provides a summary of the latest red-teaming evaluations by our VirtueRed on three leading Anthropic models—Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking, and Claude 3.5.

Introduce the new VirtueGuard Dashboard, giving you real-time insights and continuous improvements for AI security.

Introduce the new VirtueGuard Dashboard, giving you real-time insights and continuous improvements for AI security.

In this blog post, we’ll compare the security of leading AI coding products, reveal the risks they can introduce, and share security best practices for using them responsibly.

We are excited to present a comprehensive assessment of the safety and security of the recently announced Llama-3.2-Vision model, exploring its potential and challenges as compared to other existing models in our ever-advancing AI-driven future!